Skip to content

Georgijevic Developer Team

Matt Cutts: Here’s How To Expose Your Competitors’ Black Hat SEO Practices

Google’s Matt Cutts put out a Webmaster Help video discussing how to alert Google when your competitors are engaging in webspam and black hat SEO techniques. The video was in response to the following user-submitted question:

White hat search marketers read and follow Google Guidelines. What should they tell clients whose competitors use black hat techniques (such as using doorway pages) and whom continue to rank as a result of those techniques?

Do you you think Google does a good job catching webspam?

 

 

“So first and foremost, I would say do a spam report, because if you’re violating Google’s guidelines in terms of cloaking or sneaky JavaScript redirects, buying links, doorway pages, keyword stuffing, all those kinds of things, we do want to know about it,” he says. “So you can do a spam report. That’s private. You can also stop by Google’s Webmaster forum, and that’s more public, but you can do a spam report there. You can sort of say, hey, I saw this content. It seems like it’s ranking higher than it should be ranking. Here’s a real business, and it’s being outranked by this spammer…those kinds of things.”

He notes that are both Google employees and “super users” who keep an eye on the forum, and can alert Google about issues.

“The other thing that I would say is if you look at the history of which businesses have done well over time, you’ll find the sorts of sites and the sorts of businesses that are built to stand the test of time,” says Cutts. “If someone is using a technique that is a gimmick or something that’s like the SEO fad of the day, that’s a little less likely to really work well a few years from now. So a lot of the times, you’ll see people just chasing after, ‘OK, I’m going to use guest books’, or iI’m going to use link wheels’ or whatever. And then they find, ‘Oh, that stopped working as well.’ And sometimes it’s because of broad algorithmic changes like Panda. Sometimes it’s because of specific web spam targeted algorithms.”

I’m sure you’ve heard of Penguin.

He references the JC Penney and Overstock.com incidents, in which Google took manual action. For some reason, he didn’t bring up the Google Chrome incident.

This is actually a pretty timely video from Cutts, as another big paid linking controversy was uncovered by Josh Davis (which Cutts acknowledged on Twitter). Google ended up de-indexing the SEO firm involved in that.

“So my short answer is go ahead and do a spam report,” Cutts continues. “You can also report it in the forums. But it’s definitely the case that if you’re taking those higher risks, that can come back and bite you. And that can have a material impact.”

He’s not joking about that. Overstock blamed Google for “an ugly year” when its revenue plummeted. Even Google’s own Chrome penalty led to some questions about the browser’s market share.

Cutts notes that Google is also happy to get feedback at conferences, on Twitter, online, blogs, forums, “if you’re seeing sites that are prospering and are using black hat techniques.”

“Now, it’s possible that they have some low-quality links, and there are some links that people aren’t aware of that we see that are actually high quality,” Cutts notes. “But we’re happy to get spam reports. We’re happy to dig into them. And then we’ll try to find either new algorithms to try to rank the things more appropriately in the future. Or we’re certainly willing to take manual action on spam if it’s egregious or if it violates our guidelines. We have a manual web spam team that is willing to respond to those spam reports.”

According to Cutts, you can even submit spam reports using Google Docs. Here’s a conversation he had on Twitter recently:

Small Business Loses Money and Gives Up on Facebook

Written by Jenna Scaglione on May 23, 2012 in Facebook, Internet Marketing, Social Media

Imagine you spent hundreds of dollars on Facebook advertising and it resulted in only two more visitors to your website.
Does this sound familiar? It is not uncommon, especially for Peter Faulkner, chairman and owner of the small family business, Faulkner packaging.

Faulkner Packaging is a family business in the B2B industrial sector. It has been around since 1860 and passed down through generations.

Peter’s business was hit hard by the recession so he decided to start ramping up his online presence and sell his products online to reach a new set of customers. Though he knew nothing about online marketing he figured he would take the advice of the millions of people touting Facebook’s benefits and give it a try.

At nearly 60 years old, he claims he is not technologically savvy, but he jumped in anyways in response to the social media hoopla.

Peter journaled his progress while he developed his company’s online presence. He was thankful that setting up a Facebook page was not that difficult and he was up and running within days.

Here is how Peter described what happened to him:

 “I could not secure the Facebook page with the brand name until I had secured 30 likes. I sent around emails with links to the pages to my children, younger staff members and anyone else I could think of, asking them to ‘like’ my new pages. I got my likes for both and was able to secure the Facebook addresses.

Once my helpers stopped liking, I had expected the viral phenomenon of Facebook to generate more and more likes as the contagion of their likes spread to their friends and colleagues via their own Facebook pages.”

Much to Peter’s surprise he received no new likes and nothing happened.

I can hear my readers chomping at the bit with this one—but keep reading…

Peter decided to pay for Facebook ads and saw his “likes” increase, but after looking at his analytics, he realizedonly two of those fans actually clicked to visit his website.

Shutting Down the Facebook Campaign

What did he do in response? He gave up! He feels Facebook and its ads are a waste of time. But is that the consensus for every company?

General Motors seems to think so. The automaker recently pulled $10 million from its Facebook marketing budget. We don’t know if it was the failure of the campaign or a re-allocation of funds.

Does this spell the end to Facebook marketing strategies? I hardly think so.

What do you think Peter’s problem was? Was it Facebook in general or something he was doing wrong?

Here are my thoughts. I would also love to hear yours in the comments below.

Traditional vs. Inbound Marketing

Traditional marketers like Peter may have a hard time understanding the principles of inbound marketing vs. the quick return of traditional in-your-face advertising techniques. The two strategies are completely different and produce entirely separate outcomes.

Traditional marketing or outbound marketing involves banner ads, print ads, cold calling, junk mail, TV advertising, etc. These methods are more in-your-face and their publishers expect quick returns. Outbound marketing techniques still work especially for the large companies with multi-million and billion dollar advertising budgets. Yes, they are intrusive but they usually do the job if executed correctly.

Even though outbound marketing techniques are still alive and well, inbound marketing is becoming increasingly more important as business reputation and engagement is crucial to the modern consumer and their shopping habits.

Inbound marketers get found by their customers instead of jamming their business in customers’ faces. They build company cultures of trust and develop long-lasting relationships. They become so attractive that customers/prospects arrive at their OWN decision to work with them without being coerced.

Social media marketing is an inbound marketing technique. If you are a traditional marketer, much like good ol’ Peter, you will expect instant results, which does not happen in social media. Peter expected his Facebook page to explode with “Likes” once he published his page.

How long does it take to build a loyal following on Facebook? I will let you answer that question. We all know it doesn’t happen in a matter of days!

Looking Sexy on Facebook

Do you think Peter’s packaging company can look sexy on Facebook and attract leads? Possibly, but it’s not exactly the quintessential Facebook success story. After all, how sexy are boxes, bubble wrap, bags and tape?

B2B marketers can be successful on Facebook, especially if they are targeting the small business owner. But, I believe some B2B businesses may be better suited for sites such as LinkedIn. Although with Peter’s traditional marketing mindset, he probably won’t give the site enough time to see any return on investment.

Bottom line: If your customers are not on Facebook, you won’t find success there.

Peter concluded his article by saying he was sticking with the results he is getting from Google PPC. After reading an article entitled, “Google is the Internet”, Peter decided he would stay with the search engine indefinitely. Ninety-two percent of his traffic comes from his Adwords campaign so why fix what isn’t broken?

For Peter, that may be the best course of action. But for others, Facebook has become a solid marketing strategy to help them attract leads and build a great reputation online.

Are your customers/prospects/clients on Facebook?
Are you ready to dedicate time and resources to building a long-term reputation on Facebook?

If you answered “yes” to both of those questions, Facebook can bring you the quality leads you want and help you to grow your business.

Do you think Peter should have stayed on Facebook for the long haul? Are your website customers/clients on Facebook?

Can Search Save Yahoo?

To say that Yahoo has had its share of problems in the past few years is an understatement. The most recent news of the now former CEO Scott Thompson and his resume scandal has only added to the disorder surrounding Yahoo. The once highly regarded Internet giant has experienced all types of turmoil including numerous management changes, extensive layoffs, and the closing of multiple properties, all of which have raised a lot of questions about the company’s future.

Do you think Yahoo can make a comeback in search? Let us know in the comments.

The company’s “Search Alliance” with Microsoft leaves plenty of questions about the company’s future in search, as well, but there are rumors going around that the deal may not play out as planned. We spoke with Kevin Ryan, the CEO of Motivity Marketing, who says that based on rumors floating around in the industry, the search alliance between Yahoo and Microsoft might not make its projected 10-year tenure.

“There’s a lot of rumors in the business that [it] isn’t going well, and that it’s not going to make the full-decade run,” he tells us. “So, if I’m Yahoo, I’m spending a little bit of money trying to figure out how we can get that search bucket going.”

When the agreement was reached, Search Engine Land’s Danny Sullivan spoke with us about theimpact of the deal on each company. “[A] big win for Microsoft, a lot of questions for Yahoo,” he summarized.

“Yahoo effectively threw in the towel with search,” says Ryan of the alliance.

Despite the many reports on the struggling search alliance, David Pann, the General Manager of Search Networks at Microsoft, spoke with us last year and pointed out that the companies had already experienced success, even in its early stages.

“It’s easy to say, ‘Okay, well, you didn’t do this, you didn’t that – it’s a failure,’” Pann explained. “I don’t think of that. I think that, given where we are, and given the complexity of the relationship… we’re actually making very good progress.”

However, if the rumors are true and Yahoo does pull out of its agreement with Microsoft, the company will have to begin thinking about search again. The only other option would be to sell its search business completely.

Kevin Ryan, CEO of Motivity MarketingAccording to Ryan, there are several instances that could be credited as catalysts for Yahoo’s downward sprial, but he believes its Panama search ad platform played a large role in beginning the downfall. Panama was Yahoo’s attempt to monetize search, as Google did, but instead, Ryan says it was an “abject failure” for Yahoo.

Ryan compares Yahoo’s current situation to what happened with Ask. The former search engine pulled out of the search industry in 2010 and has now transformed itself into a questions and answers service with an emphasis on mobile.

There are some who would likely consider Yahoo to be a former search engine as well. Yahoo is currently in the process of reinventing itself as a media company, but the company’s short-term leaders have had difficulty in making this transition. Ryan, however, doesn’t believe this particular attempt is the best option for Yahoo.

“Stop trying to reverse engineer HuffPo,” said Ryan, “and create something new.”

But, Yahoo’s performance as a media company has been nothing to shake a stick at, and for many, Yahoo’s homepage works very well as a portal to the Web. Just take a look at Yahoo’s realtime homepage view counter at any given day. So far today (at 8:30AM Pacific), the page has already seen over 73 million views .

Yahoo Homepage views

Still, Ryan tells us that Yahoo should reinvest in its core business, in which search plays a very big role. With a renewed focus in this area, he believes Yahoo could better serve consumers and also advertisers, which could help it get back on the right track.

Ryan told us there could be opportunities for Yahoo in terms of social development. Both Google and Bing have yet to completely succeed in social, which leaves an open door for Yahoo. He believes that a renewed focus on search combined with the opportunities in social could help to begin to turn Yahoo around. In addition, Ryan would like to see Yahoo make drastic changes internally in order to streamline its processes and improve its culture.

“I hope that the change that Yahoo makes will be very internal,” he said. “I hope that the culture internally will become much more positive, but we’ll see.”

At this point, Ross Levinsohn is Yahoo’s interim CEO. Although some people believe he will become the permanent CEO, Yahoo has not indicated any official word for who its next leader will be.

It’s inevitable that changes will happen at Yahoo in the coming months, but what they will be and whether or not they will be effective in saving the company are both still in question. On the positive side, Yahoo was able to finally reach an agreement with Alibaba Group. The $7 billion deal will require Yahoo to sell back half its stake in the Chinese company, but it brings resolution to one of its many problems.

Source: http://www.webpronews.com/could-a-reinvestment-in-search-save-yahoo-2012-05

10 Majestic Ways to Combat & Recover from Google Penguin Update

Google Penguin Update ? You might be thinking, Google must be an animal lover as they keep most of their Algorithm Updates name as that of Animal Names. The most renowned and threatening name is Panda. You must got goosebumps by hearing this name ;) It’s a nightmare to all the Bloggers and Webmasters. Google Panda Update is a change to the Google’s search results ranking algorithm that was first released in February 2011. The change aimed to lower the rank of low-quality sites, and return higher-quality sites near the top of the search results.

How to Stay Safe from Google Penguin UpdateNow in the recent pastime, Google came up with their new algorithm update which was named as Google Penguin Update. This update was launched on April 24, 2012 with the purpose to encounter “Web Spam” in the SERP’s.

When we search for a typical keyword we find a bunch of results in the search page and from which half contain no information or don’t have any content on the topic. But how did they rank so high ? It is because they have strong internal keywords in their blog for the specific search query. In order to minimize these spammed results, this update was introduced.

Google Penguin Update will be applicable to all the languages simultaneously and approximately it will affect 3% of the search queries. But anyhow the percentage could be higher in those languages in which more Web Spam is used.

How to know if you’re a Victim ?

Well, that’s a big question to find out whether you have been affected by the Google Penguin Update or not. As the update was instantaneous on April 24th, 2012 then the best way to check out is through your Google Analytics Tool. Always remember that getting affected by the Google Algorithm Updates doesn’t only harm your blog but can also reward your blog.Victims of Google Penguin UpdateSimply check the traffic stats of your blog from April 24th 2012. If it’s sudden fall then you’re badly affected by the update. Try to follow the tips which are provided below after the jump. If you find it increasing then Congrats! You have been rewarded due to fair performance by following all good practices which made you a deserving one in front of Google ;)

Tips to Survive from Google Penguin Update

How to Stay Safe from Google Penguin Update
1. Eliminate SPAM

How to Stay Safe from Google Penguin UpdateWhen you write your post, you include some or many outbound links to particular keywords. This is good for SEO only when you confirm where are you linking too. Always avoid text links to pages with the exact keyword for positioning.

Actually it doesn’t looks natural. And yes, Eliminate what you believe could be considered as SPAM by Google. I hope you can judge it yourself!

2. Avoiding Excess KEYWORDS

Many people have a habit of adding more than 3-4 keywords into their posts. And that too long term keywords which is a bad practice. Google will jot your post down to the end if you’re using excessive keywords. It is advisable to target one particular keyword, may be short or long term and maintain a keyword density of 2% i.e. the keyword should appear 10-12 times inside the post. But always eliminate the excess junk from your page.

How to Stay Safe from Google Penguin Update

3. Take Down PLAGIARIZED Posts

Plagiarism is the practice to take someone else’s work or ideas and passing or publishing them off as one’s own. In simple it’s called copying. Remember ? The thing we used to do in exams ! ;) But doing the same over the internet on your blog can penalize you a lot.

How to Recover from Google Penguin Update

“DO NOT PUBLISH COPIED CONTENT! I repeat, do not publish copied content.” This can pay you hard. Those who copy content through scrapping techniques will be badly affected by the Penguin. If you have some older copied contents, then modify them but don’t delete as you will loose lot of traffic by doing this. Creativity and Genuineness are the two vital factors that defines a Good Blogger.

4. Don’t Do Link FARMING

Sometimes while adding links into the post, people don’t make any sense with the links. For an example, a Telecommunication website linking or directing you to a NGO website! Does this make any sense ? An user will click on a link in order to know about a telecom product and they will be redirected to a NGO, a social service’s link. Always avoid such of type of linking practices.

How to Stay Safe from Google Penguin Update

If you’re purchasing links for your website make sure that their quality is strong and good. There should be any questions upon the quality. Getting poor quality links will take your site down.

5. Avoid HIDDEN Content/Invisible Texts

This is the worst practice which is to be badly avoided. Many people place hidden content and links in their posts with the goal of being favored by the search engines in order to rank higher without consideration of user experience. Clever minds hide the content and links using CSS and the non-coders hide it by making the text to white color.

How to Stay Safe from Google Penguin Update

Google has strictly revised their algorithms and those who play with this method would be severely penalized. This is the first and foremost change of Google Penguin Update. You can track the hidden content by selecting all the lines of the paragraph and the white color will be highlighted with the selection.

6. Don’t Even Think of Keyword STUFFING

In order to get Recovery from Google Penguin Update you have to stop keyword stuffing. Basically, Keyword Stuffing refers to creating pages and publishing posts with false and illogical content just to be positioned on a keyword. In short, fooling the users to get the wrong information. When an user arrives at a particular page, he/she is bought to an entirely different one.

How to Recover from Google Penguin UpdateJust think of it, when you’re in a new city and you’re seeking the address of a particular place and someone misleads you to a wrong address, how will you feel ? The same feeling will be evolved within your readers when they land on a  and might be they won’t come back to your site the next time. So in order to play fair in the other way don’t provide false keywords and confuse your readers.

7. Stop Black Hat Linking/SEO Strategies

Black Hat SEO Techniques are notorious ways to get the ranking results you want i.e. getting higher search rankings in an unethical manner. These strategies usually breaks the Rules and Regulations of Search Engines and creates poor user experience directly as they are utilized on the websites. Google Penguin Update is mainly targeted to minimize the ‘Web Spam’ so the sites indulging in these activities will be knock down.

How to Stay Safe from Google Penguin Update

The strong websites containing high quality contents will be rewarded to the top positions as the black hat sites will be penalized for their activities which differs from their main page. Black hat SEO basically is a short-sighted solution to a long-term problem, which is creating a Website that provides both a great user experience and all that goes with that. These black hat SEO practices will actually provide short-term gains in terms of rankings, but if you are discovered utilizing these spammy techniques on your Web site, you run the risk of being penalized by search engines.

8. Keep the Doorway Pages outside the DOORS

A Doorway page is basically a fake page that the user will never see. It is purely for search engine spiders, and attempts to trick them into indexing the site higher. Some of the webmasters play with this technique to impress the search engines and for targeting specific keywords by creating low quality or poor pages. The content generated in the Doorway pages is automated especially scrapped content which are not convenient for the users.

How to Recover from Google Penguin Update

By creating such pages and kind off cheating the search engines, they do end up getting higher search rankings,  that is until these same sites get banned for using unethical practices. It’s just not worth the risk! It doesn’t provide a sign of good practices. So better stay outta it.

9. Check for LOW Inbound Links

Inbound links or Backlinks are the incoming links to a website or webpage. Inbound links are used by Google and other search engines as a main factor in determining the relevance of your site. The more the number of links, the more good will be your site at link building. People become happy when they receive a backlink but the happiness should matter only when the backlink is from a High PR/Reputed Website.

Check on your GWT (Google Webmasters Tool) if you’re receiving low quality website links like from Blog Commenting, Article Directory Submissions etc. It determines that your site is more renowned among the low quality atmosphere and you won’t rank to high. After the strict revisions of Google Algorithms, your high quality backlinks determines the stability and endurance of your site. So chuck the poor incoming links.

10. Dump the Use of CHEAP SEO Services

In order to perform Strong On-Page SEO, People use some Premium SEO Services (here premium refers to the cheapest price) to boost their sites in the search engines. They are unaware that using these services are a practice of Black Hat SEO and are strictly against Google’s Terms of Service.

SEO Services includes a package of DoFollow Backlinks like from .edu and .gov sites which may sound good for your site but are not worth it. Once Google tracked that you’re using third party methods to boost your search engine rankings, then it will severely penalize you in their next update. And once you’re badly hit with Panda or Penguin it will take you hell  a lot of time to regain your blog’s stability and performance. So always be fair at your plays in front of Google in order to get rewarded in their updates and not get affected!

Read more from here : 10 Majestic Ways to Combat & Recover from Google Penguin Update http://www.technocruze.com/google-penguin-update-recovery/#ixzz1vXdKghLC

Should Google Rethink its Algorithms and Policies

Google is a big organization. In fact it is one of the big organizations and is impossibly influential on the net. For this reason it’s fair to say that Google would never admit it made a mistake, that’s just the unfortunate nature of big business.

But despite the fact that they aren’t coming clean on this matter, most of us can still see fairly clearly that they’ve not done things perfectly lately and that they’ve put their foot wrong a few times. And in fact the current condition of the search engine is one of the worst it’s been in well… ever and there are plenty of bloggers currently picking up on the problems.

Think I’m just moaning? Here are just a few of the reasons that Google could do with taking a step back and having a bit of rethink.

Penguin Hasn’t Worked

Google Penguin was the most recent algorithm change that was supposed to punish sites that were using black hat techniques and over optimization in a similar way that Panda did and to this end it targeted spun content as well as large numbers of links from unworthy sources. The problem with this is that it removed a bunch of sites from the top spots that were simply trying to use SEO the way they’d been taught, and that then meant that nothing but dross was left over. Do a search for ‘make money online’ for instance and the top few results include empty blogs and cyber squatters. That’s hardly a sign of success and it’s not what Google’s visitors want to see. For this reason alone then, Google needs to rethink its algorithm.

Negative SEO

Negative SEO means that you do bad SEO for another site so that it gets penalized by Google, and so that you then have less competition for the terms you’re trying to rank for. That’s not really Google’s fault, but unfortunately Google’s recent Penguin update has only served to make these negative SEO strategies that much more effective. In other words at the moment Google is unable to differentiate between the sites that deserve penalizing and those that are victims of malicious attacks – and of course that’s not really ideal. This is something that Google is going to have to change as more and more people start cottoning on to negative SEO as an immoral yet effective way to boost their site.

Competition from Bing

I doubt right now that Google is losing sleep over the competition, but that doesn’t change the fact that Bing is gaining ground while Google is losing it. At the moment the gap is still rather large, but slips like the Penguin update could help to close that gap for Bing which means Google needs to be on its best behaviour over the next couple of years to avoid a search Engine with a company that has more resources and money.

Privacy Policy Issues

Google’s recent changes to their privacy policy saw them coming under fire from European authorities that saw them as a breach of their privacy laws. This isn’t only of course a worry in itself, but also bad publicity for Google who have been steering themselves toward some ‘market monopoly’ style strategies lately. If they want to reverse their fortunes in this regard then giving users back some of their privacy could be a good move.

Allen Beery runs an online business and has recently started branching out on an education related business by taking a Kumon Franchise. He writes about SEO, business opportunity and education.

Source: http://site-reference.com/articles/should-google-rethink-its-algorithms-and-policies/

If You Must Get Links, Do It Like This

This is a piggyback article that I’m posting on the heels of How to Get Links Without Trying to Get Links, so make sure to give it a read if you haven’t already. For me, the takeaway was this:

What I mean is that by focusing on linking, sometimes we will unknowingly offer less-than-stellar content because our focus is off kilter. And I think our readers can smell it a mile away.

What Jenna’s saying here is that we, as SEOs and webmasters, have become so entrenched in metrics and measurements and charts and mega-graphs that we seem to have lost sight of the fundamentals upon which the Web was built.

Stellar content.

For a Minute There, We Lost Ourselves

Think about it. If you’ve been doing this Internet thing for a while, then you know exactly what I’m talking about. Let’s take a poll, shall we?

Do you do any of the following? Select from the list below:

  • Do you use any software with a title that begins with an explosive adjective (mega/massive/jet-propelled/turbo-fueled) and is immediately followed by the words “niche finder”?
  • Do you devote more time to keyword research than you do to sleep?
  • Have you optimized each and every page of your beloved website with your best cherry-picked “money” keywords?
  • Do you watch your rankings for said keywords in the SERPs with bated breath, expecting movement… any… second… now…
  • Do you own some sort of paid traffic tool?
  • Do you know exactly when to expect the Googlebot to come crawling?

If you answered “yes” to any of the above questions, then don’t panic. You are still a good person. I swear. And these traits aren’t inherently bad, even though the Big G sometimes seems to want us to think otherwise.

On the contrary, it’s GOOD to monitor your sites and traffic. It’s GOOD to do research if your ultimate objective is to rank. But the problem is that the desire to rank has outweighed the desire to produce quality content, which then becomes a chicken-and-egg argument. The true metric is whether you enjoy the subject of the site you’re creating. Is it something you’re passionate about? Enthusiastic, even? Do you like it even just a teensy little smidge? If not, you’re doing this for all the wrong reasons, and that “less-than-stellar” content Jenna was harping on will soon begin gracing your sad, over-optimized pages – if it’s not there already.

Instead, why don’t you try following the Site-Reference method?

Make the content, love the subject, get fired up, and the audience will follow. However, it is indeed true that you can create prolific content and still suffer traffic malfunctions. It happens. The Web has just as much amazing stuff as it does garbage, so it will take a whole heck of a lot of work, passion, and exposure to get your shot at the limelight.

Let’s Talk About Exposure

What defines exposure on the Web? Shh… It’s the four-letter word Google doesn’t want to hear you say. That’s right: It’s a link. And Google’s stance on backlinking is an ever-changing one. We’ll never know the true extent of the metrics used since we don’t have any way to find the Big G’s secret sauce for its algorithm.

In a post-Panda, post-Penguin world, what do we know about link building?

Well, we know negative SEO is on the rise. With all the controversy, that’s kind of a given. But it’s caused us to lose sight of something we’ve known for quite some time: That most sites have oodles of links which Google doesn’t count at all. Check out what Matt Cutts had to say about the matter ages ago.

We also know that Post-Penguin, quality links are the name of the game. That means that links from pages on sites that Google trusts are key to ranking. Trust from Google translates to PageRank (PR). Sites are ranked on a scale of zero to ten with zero being the least amount of trust and authority in Google’s eyes. Most sites have trouble breaking a two. The system’s tough, and Google employs an army of manual reviewers with the sole task of assigning PR to pages on websites (are you starting to understand why quality content is so vital yet? Hint: It’s bigger than just your traffic).

Before, the easy way to get some link juice from high-PR pages was simply to drop a few thousand blog comments on them, buy some paid guest posts, or purchase some sidebar links, right? Well, times have changed, and so must your strategy.

The New Way to Get Juice

Google’s changed. It will continue to change, and so will the Internet. It’s the nature of technology. Here’s what won’t: It will always be imperative to produce stellar content. I’m going to break the process into two steps:

1. Love your niche.

Loving your niche means being passionate about the subject of your site. It also means connecting with others in your niche and being part of the conversation, the recent events, the news. When you’re connected, you have your finger on the pulse of your industry, and by default your content will take the information and add to it in a meaningful way, which in turn will drive the conversation forward and make your voice matter.

2. Get involved with the leaders.

Once you have the first step in check, this next one should come naturally. The leaders in your niche likely have pages with decent (or great) PR already, otherwise they wouldn’t be leaders. When you connect with them, you may just end up with a presence on their site or blog – or even unprovoked mentions in their posts – after all, they’ll look to you for insight and the newest industry information, so the backlinking will come naturally.

Do you see what I did there? Once you’re hot and heavy in your niche’s ecosystem, the backlinking will grow from that involvement, and I think that’s precisely what Google is after.

Source: http://site-reference.com/articles/if-you-must-get-links-do-it-like-this/

Link Building in a Penguin World

You may be wondering how to handle some of the recent updates such as Panda and Penguin and whatever other black-and-white animal updates (Is the Zebra algorithm, next?) Google decides to throw at us website owners.

Here’s the basic answer: LINKS STILL WORK. And they work well. If links did not work, Google would not be so concerned about the effectiveness of them. Also, if Google banned every single person they thought were buying links then you could just point a bunch of links to every competitor ahead of you, get them all banned and move to #1. It just doesn’t work that way.

Now, with that being said, Google is getting “smarter” about link profiling. For instance, let’s say you have a site about car insurance quotes. Before these recent updates, you could just create the anchor text for ‘car insurance quotes’ and point a bunch of links to that anchor text and your rankings would typically rise over time (obviously this is a little over-simplified because there are hundreds of factors in Google’s algorithm like content, the age of your domain, your title tags, etc. but you get the idea). What’s happening now is that Google is also comparing these anchors relative to other anchors that your site is linked to. So if you have 1000 links with the anchor text ‘car insurance quotes’ and no other anchors or just anchors with other similar terms like ‘car quotes’, that looks very unnatural and typically Google will no longer count all 1000 links. They may only count a few hundred of those links now instead of 1000. This is why rankings have dropped for some people not because the site got banned or penalized. It was simply over-optimized and Google is readjusting for that over-optimization by discounting links they think are out of whack.